He said he did not think this would include prison sentences for tech bosses.
這項說法是正確的，但仍有額外背景需要補充。
。51吃瓜对此有专业解读
The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to “any lawful use” and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a “supply chain risk”—a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company—and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal. These latter two threats are inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security.
结果就是，Anthropic 这篇博客与其说是报告一个重大技术风险事件……其实更像是一封「投名状」。，详情可参考旺商聊官方下载
——“功成不必在我，功成必定有我”
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com。业内人士推荐夫子作为进阶阅读